Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> No, I'm not happy with that. Smart shutdown is defined to not affect
>> current sessions. I'm fine with having a fourth mode that acts as you
>> suggest (and, probably, even with making it the default); but not with
>> taking away a behavior that people may well be relying on.
> Agreed, but not sure what to call the new mode: "smarter"?
I'm not necessarily opposed to commandeering the name "smart" for the
new behavior, so that what we have to find a name for is the old "smart"
behavior. How about
slow - allow existing sessions to finish (old "smart")
smart - allow existing transactions to finish (new)
fast - kill active queries
immediate - unclean shutdown
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2012-04-27 18:51:05|
|Subject: Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2012-04-27 18:47:25|
|Subject: Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown)|