Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation
Date: 2006-05-07 15:19:38
Message-ID: 24857.1147015178@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> While we have installed a Win32-specific semaphore implementation for
> CVS HEAD, what do we want do apply for the back branches, 8.0.X and
> 8.1.X.  Is this the patch that should be applied?

Leave 'em alone.  That code has zero field validation, and should
certainly not get shipped until it's survived a beta-test cycle.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2006-05-07 16:03:45
Subject: Demoting the "width" part of EXPLAIN
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-05-07 13:43:21
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Sven SuursohoDate: 2006-05-07 17:44:41
Subject: Re: plpython improvements
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-05-07 15:05:43
Subject: Re: pgstat: delayed write of stats file

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group