"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> writes:
> I think that at least 1 & 2 from WAL todo (checkpoints and port to
> machines without TAS) is required before beta.

I'm not sure that you do need to add support for machines without TAS.
I pointed out a couple months ago that the non-TAS support code hasn't
even compiled for the past release or three, and proposed ripping it
all out rather than fixing code that clearly isn't being used.
No one objected.

I haven't got round to doing the ripping yet, but as far as I know
there is no reason to expend work on adding more code for the non-TAS
case.

I have a few other things I still need to do before 7.1 beta.  Do you
think you'll be ready in, say, a week?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• RE: WAL status update at 2000-10-31 21:04:15 from Mikheev, Vadim

Responses

• Re: WAL status update at 2000-11-02 17:43:40 from Vadim Mikheev

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Denis Perchine	Date: 2000-11-02 13:39:29
	Subject: DROP hangup...
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2000-11-02 09:10:25
	Subject: Re: Contexts