Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking
Date: 2004-06-14 16:27:02
Message-ID: 2480.1087230422@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Yes, killing (or rather closing the pipe to it) early is probably the 
> right idea.

Right, we can just close the pipe.  I was thinking of adding another
signal but that's obviously easier.  Will work on making this happen.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-06-14 16:39:08
Subject: Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2004-06-14 16:23:31
Subject: Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group