Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Bruce seems to be willing to accept a window of failure for RENAME
>> TABLE in order to make database admin easier. That is very possibly
>> the right tradeoff --- but it is *not* an open-and-shut decision.
>> We need to talk about it.
> How about creating a hard link during RENAME, and you can just remove
> the old link on commit or remove the new link on transaction rollback?
Still non-atomic as far as I can see...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Hiroshi Inoue||Date: 2000-03-08 09:40:20|
|Subject: RE: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-03-08 08:31:40|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block |