Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type
Date: 2004-06-07 05:20:03
Message-ID: 24532.1086585603@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> ...  Remove the ancient SET entry
>> in pg_type, which is now highly unlikely to ever become used again.

> Hehe - speaking of how we never remove types :)

Hm?  I think the recent discussion was about contracting not to
arbitrarily reassign OIDs for existing types.  Nobody said anything
about not being able to remove types, especially not ones as dead as
this doornail was.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2004-06-07 05:23:33
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-06-07 04:52:10
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Some preliminary documentation for composite-type stuff.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group