Re: Re: [hackers-jp: 219] Re: postgresql-8.1.4文字セットサポート

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, 本家pgsql-hackersについて日本語で議論するML <hackers-jp(at)ml(dot)postgresql(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [hackers-jp: 219] Re: postgresql-8.1.4文字セットサポート
Date: 2006-07-28 15:20:45
Message-ID: 24384.1154100045@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> writes:
>> Just to confirm, it does look like there's a discrepancy between what
>> is in the documentation and the actual behavior of the server. The
>> documentation indicates that SJIS is a valid server encoding:

> This is a documentation error --- SJIS is certainly not a valid server
> encoding (it's not 8-bit-safe). Will fix --- thanks for pointing it out.

Actually, table 21-2 does say that SJIS isn't supported as a server
encoding, but the text at the top of the page (before table 21-1) is
pretty misleading --- it implies that every character set we have
is allowed as a server-side encoding. I'm going to change that text,
and also add a column to table 21-1 marking the supported server
encodings.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-28 15:28:20 Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-28 15:09:11 Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] [Fwd: RE: Build farm on Windows]