From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, 本家pgsql-hackersについて日本語で議論するML <hackers-jp(at)ml(dot)postgresql(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: [hackers-jp: 219] Re: postgresql-8.1.4文字セットサポート |
Date: | 2006-07-28 15:20:45 |
Message-ID: | 24384.1154100045@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> writes:
>> Just to confirm, it does look like there's a discrepancy between what
>> is in the documentation and the actual behavior of the server. The
>> documentation indicates that SJIS is a valid server encoding:
> This is a documentation error --- SJIS is certainly not a valid server
> encoding (it's not 8-bit-safe). Will fix --- thanks for pointing it out.
Actually, table 21-2 does say that SJIS isn't supported as a server
encoding, but the text at the top of the page (before table 21-1) is
pretty misleading --- it implies that every character set we have
is allowed as a server-side encoding. I'm going to change that text,
and also add a column to table 21-1 marking the supported server
encodings.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-28 15:28:20 | Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-28 15:09:11 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] [Fwd: RE: Build farm on Windows] |