Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, "Pete St(dot) Onge" <pete(at)economics(dot)utoronto(dot)ca>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines
Date: 2005-07-20 18:10:29
Message-ID: 24250.1121883029@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Couldn't we just run the distprep actions (flex, bison) through contrib
> as well? That wouldn't hurt anyone, I think.

No objection here (though of course it doesn't affect the buildfarm issue).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-07-20 20:44:27 Re: [HACKERS] Patch to fix plpython on OS X
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-07-20 17:59:33 Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines