imad <immaad(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> So, should we still consider it a ToDo?

Whatever you think about the rename-in-same-block-as-declared case,
it's still broken, as per my example showing that the effects are not
limited to the containing block.  However, considering that no one
has taken an interest in fixing it since 7.2, it's obviously not a
high-priority feature.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: PL/pgSQL RENAME functionality in TODOs at 2007-02-02 18:40:05 from imad

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-02-02 21:14:33
	Subject: Re: Referential Integrity and SHARE locks
Previous:	From: Ioseph Kim	Date: 2007-02-02 21:00:29
	Subject: Re: problem of geometric operator in v8.2.1