Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PL/pgSQL RENAME functionality in TODOs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: imad <immaad(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL RENAME functionality in TODOs
Date: 2007-02-02 21:11:37
Message-ID: 24190.1170450697@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
imad <immaad(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> So, should we still consider it a ToDo?

Whatever you think about the rename-in-same-block-as-declared case,
it's still broken, as per my example showing that the effects are not
limited to the containing block.  However, considering that no one
has taken an interest in fixing it since 7.2, it's obviously not a
high-priority feature.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-02-02 21:14:33
Subject: Re: Referential Integrity and SHARE locks
Previous:From: Ioseph KimDate: 2007-02-02 21:00:29
Subject: Re: problem of geometric operator in v8.2.1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group