Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgdump

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>,Enrico <scotty(at)linuxtime(dot)it>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgdump
Date: 2005-01-17 07:40:19
Message-ID: 24033.1105947619@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 01:19 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Just to be clear: what I understand the logic to be is "OR" across
>> multiple switches of the same type, but "AND" across switches of
>> two types.

> If I understand you correctly, you're suggesting that we should only
> report an error if none of the specified tables exist OR none of the
> specified schemas exist.

No, I was only expressing an opinion about what should be dumped,
not about what kind of diagnostic messages to issue.

If you want to warn about switches that fail to match anything,
go for it.  (I vote for just a warning, though, not a hard error.)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: pgdump at 2005-01-17 06:46:39 from Neil Conway

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: John HansenDate: 2005-01-17 08:04:49
Subject: Re: ARC patent
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-01-17 06:46:39
Subject: Re: pgdump

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group