Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Performance of count(*)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance of count(*)
Date: 2007-03-22 19:40:33
Message-ID: 23628.1174592433@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
"Craig A. James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> You mean
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-10/msg00283.php
>> ?  I don't see anything there that bears on Steve's suggestion.

> Mea culpa, it's October 8, not October 18:
>    http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-10/msg00143.php

I still don't see the relevance to Steve's suggestion.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tino WildenhainDate: 2007-03-22 19:56:50
Subject: Re: Performance of count(*)
Previous:From: Craig A. JamesDate: 2007-03-22 19:18:24
Subject: Re: Performance of count(*)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group