Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: proposal: additional error fields

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: additional error fields
Date: 2012-05-01 23:22:15
Message-ID: 23462.1335914535@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> There is another advantage to doing this within the core system that I
> have not touched upon, which is that in this way we can expose another
> useful GUC to reduce log noise, beyond log_min_messages.

Yeah, that one is actually a pretty compelling argument.  A *lot* of
people would like to have a setting for "log only non-routine errors",
I think.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-05-02 00:05:07
Subject: Re: proposal: additional error fields
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-05-01 23:11:02
Subject: Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group