Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Another thought I have here is to wonder whether we should change
> something on the server side so that we don't NEED such a complicated
> archive_command. I mean, copying a file to a directory somewhere is
> not fundamentally a complex operation. Nor is using ssh to copy it to
> another machine.
It is once you consider error handling and catering to N combinations of
I think the notion that we should get rid of archive_command in favor of
something more hard-wired is sheer lunacy. We have a nicely decoupled
arrangement for dealing with these issues now; why would we want to pull
them into the server?
Now, providing a more useful sample script is certainly reasonable.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2011-09-02 19:38:30|
|Subject: Re: CF2011-09|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-09-02 19:23:07|
|Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress |