Re: ECPG CVS version problems

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ECPG CVS version problems
Date: 2003-06-16 13:22:11
Message-ID: 2310.1055769731@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces pgsql-patches

Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> I think we still have preproc.c auto-generated from preproc.y in our
> archive, don't we?

It's not in CVS (and shouldn't be IMHO); but it is built during tarball
creation (including nightly snapshots). So only people who use CVS
directly need to have bison.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-16 13:36:00 Re: enumeration type?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-06-16 12:44:34 Re: client encodings

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-06-16 14:51:16 Re: Some quick notes about extending libpq for new
Previous Message Paul Tilles 2003-06-16 12:14:56 Re: [Fwd: PREPARE in ECPG]

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-16 14:20:31 Re: Thread configure flag
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-06-16 12:44:01 Re: Thread configure flag