Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ECPG CVS version problems

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ECPG CVS version problems
Date: 2003-06-16 13:22:11
Message-ID: 2310.1055769731@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfacespgsql-patches
Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> I think we still have preproc.c auto-generated from preproc.y in our
> archive, don't we?

It's not in CVS (and shouldn't be IMHO); but it is built during tarball
creation (including nightly snapshots).  So only people who use CVS
directly need to have bison.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-06-16 13:36:00
Subject: Re: enumeration type?
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-06-16 12:44:34
Subject: Re: client encodings

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-06-16 14:20:31
Subject: Re: Thread configure flag
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-06-16 12:44:01
Subject: Re: Thread configure flag

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-06-16 14:51:16
Subject: Re: Some quick notes about extending libpq for new
Previous:From: Paul TillesDate: 2003-06-16 12:14:56
Subject: Re: [Fwd: PREPARE in ECPG]

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group