Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: rm_cleanup functions need to be allowed to write WAL entries.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: rm_cleanup functions need to be allowed to write WAL entries.
Date: 2009-08-10 19:15:00
Message-ID: 22882.1249931700@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Are hash indexes going to need auto-rebuild, or can we make them
> WAL-safe eventually?

I see no reason they couldn't be made WAL-safe.  Just no one has
bothered yet.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-08-10 20:03:12
Subject: Re: pgsql: Ship documentation without intermediate tarballs Documentation
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-08-10 19:09:20
Subject: Re: pgsql: rm_cleanup functions need to be allowed to write WAL entries.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group