"Albe Laurenz" <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at> writes:
> I did not only add them to the Makefile for interfaces/libpq,
> but also everywhere something is linked against libpq in case
> somebody links static.
I intensely dislike that part of the patch, but will work on applying
If we do need to start mentioning all of libpq's dependencies everywhere
it's linked, I think it's time for a generic solution to that, instead
of hacking each such place over again every time a new dependency pops up.
But at the moment I'm unconvinced that we need to do it.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: elein||Date: 2006-09-08 19:41:02|
|Subject: Re: Domains and subtypes, a brief proposal|
|Previous:||From: Gevik Babakhani||Date: 2006-09-08 19:18:20|
|Subject: Proposal for GUID datatype|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2006-09-08 19:47:46|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix linking of OpenLDAP libraries|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2006-09-08 17:59:47|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Simplifying "standby mode"|