Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org
Subject: Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Date: 2001-12-30 16:52:58
Message-ID: 221.1009731178@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Your patches seem lightly enhanced 7.2 performance on AIX 5L (still
> slower than 7.1, however).

It's awfully hard to see what's happening near the left end of that
chart. May I suggest plotting the x-axis on a log scale?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-30 18:04:29 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-12-30 07:53:09 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-30 18:04:29 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-12-30 07:53:09 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem