Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

AW: Applying TOAST to CURRENT

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Jan Wieck'" <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "'PostgreSQL HACKERS'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: AW: Applying TOAST to CURRENT
Date: 2000-05-31 07:28:51
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C604AF7DB9@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>     Hmmm - thinking about that it doesn't sound bad if we allways
>     create a secondary relation at CREATE TABLE time, but NOT the
>     index  for  it.  And at VACUUM time we create the index if it
>     doesn't exist AND there is external stored data.

Seems we are trying to reduce the dependency on vacuum in other
areas (e.g. overwriting smgr). 
I would prefer explicit syntax to enable toast (create table and alter
table).

Andreas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-05-31 10:43:54
Subject: Re: SET FSYNC command?
Previous:From: Peter VazsonyiDate: 2000-05-31 06:45:08
Subject: Re: 7.0 weirdness

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group