From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Doc reference of contrib modules |
Date: | 2011-01-25 15:17:06 |
Message-ID: | 21985.1295968626@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> That is an interesting case. I didn't mention "module" here because
> above this ia a dblink() function call, and we are referencing the
> function call in the text. I couldn't figure out how to mention
> "module" here without making the text more complex. I thought of:
> The <link linkend="CONTRIB-DBLINK">dblink</> function (part of the
> dblink module) executes a remote query.
> but that seems awkward. Ideas?
That's not just awkward, but flat wrong, because the link points to
documentation of the module not the function. Correct would be
something like
The <function>dblink()</> function (part of the
<link linkend="CONTRIB-DBLINK">dblink</> module) executes a remote query.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-25 15:26:28 | Re: Doc reference of contrib modules |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-25 14:59:52 | Re: Doc reference of contrib modules |