Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: use GUC for cmdline

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: use GUC for cmdline
Date: 2001-06-22 01:09:20
Message-ID: 2182.993172160@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> writes:
>> Uh, removing the security checks is NOT what I had in mind.  Wasn't
>> my example clear enough?

> Ee, this is done in set_config_option?

No, you still need the if (secure) --- because that changes while
we're reading the switches.  *If* secure is true, it's okay to set
the option with PGC_POSTMASTER context.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Rainer MagerDate: 2001-06-22 04:56:17
Subject: RE: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
Previous:From: Marko KreenDate: 2001-06-22 00:36:40
Subject: Re: use GUC for cmdline

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group