Re: pg_dump additional options for performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Date: 2008-07-24 07:54:01
Message-ID: 21687.1216886041@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> [80k patch]

Surely there is a whole lot of unintended noise in this patch?
I certainly don't believe that you meant to change keywords.c
for instance.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Zaun 2008-07-24 08:30:56 Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows
Previous Message Jeroen Vermeulen 2008-07-24 07:53:02 Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-24 08:56:49 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-24 07:37:11 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance