Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling
Date: 2009-12-31 03:54:00
Message-ID: 21634.1262231640@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> That doesn't seem like enough to guarantee that you've got the right
>> function.

> As Tim said elsewhere:
>> I don't see either of those as significant issues: "If you need more
>> control for a particular SP then don't use SP::* to call that SP."

If the thing actively fails when there's more than one possible match,
that might be ok.  Randomly choosing a match, not so much.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Craig RingerDate: 2009-12-31 04:17:29
Subject: Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-12-31 03:50:11
Subject: pg_migrator issues

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group