"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> That doesn't seem like enough to guarantee that you've got the right
> As Tim said elsewhere:
>> I don't see either of those as significant issues: "If you need more
>> control for a particular SP then don't use SP::* to call that SP."
If the thing actively fails when there's more than one possible match,
that might be ok. Randomly choosing a match, not so much.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Craig Ringer||Date: 2009-12-31 04:17:29|
|Subject: Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2009-12-31 03:50:11|
|Subject: pg_migrator issues|