Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas...
Date: 2003-04-26 22:25:15
Message-ID: 21483.1051395915@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
> And actually, it looks like sequences have this same problem as well,
> only things are slightly worse there: you have to grant SELECT,UPDATE
> to a sequence to the public in order for those to work
> automagically. :-/

That's always been true though.

			regards, tom lane


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Sean ChittendenDate: 2003-04-26 22:34:08
Subject: Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas...
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-04-26 22:24:18
Subject: Re: [EXAMPLE] Overly zealous security of schemas...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group