Re: pg_dump locks a table on dumping ... ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump locks a table on dumping ... ?
Date: 2004-03-23 17:02:40
Message-ID: 21464.1080061360@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> 'k, just had someone tell me that they believed that a pg_dump will lock a
> table while the dump is happening ... my first thought/response was that
> this would defeat the point of MVCC, no? And would make for a terrible
> backup procedure on a very large database, since you'd just have made your
> database useless for the duration ...

> Can someone confirm/deny that the lock happens?

pg_dump takes a reader's lock (AccessShareLock). This does not prevent
reads or writes of the table. It does prevent dropping the table,
making schema alterations to it (such as column add/drop), or anything
else that wants an exclusive lock. I think that VACUUM FULL is the only
thing particularly likely to cause a conflict in a running database.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dustin Sallings 2004-03-23 17:18:11 Re: linked list rewrite
Previous Message Frank Wiles 2004-03-23 16:53:10 Re: linked list rewrite