From:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc:
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,
pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL
Date:
2007-10-04 21:08:29
Message-ID:
21198.1191532109@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2007-10-04 14:11:22 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2007-10-04 14:29:00 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2007-10-04 14:50:16 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2007-10-04 20:03:22 from Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
2007-10-04 20:14:51 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2007-10-04 20:24:43 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2007-10-04 20:27:06 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2007-10-04 21:08:29 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2007-11-09 02:50:45 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2007-11-09 08:22:05 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2007-11-10 14:37:38 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Could we maybe have some flavor of ROLLBACK that doesn't issue a warning
> if no transaction is in progress? There is precedent for this sort of
> facility - DROP ... IF EXISTS.
Something that would actually be doable for 8.3 would be to downgrade
this particular WARNING to a NOTICE. A DBA who hasn't got
log_min_messages set higher than NOTICE hasn't really got a lot of room
to whine about bulky logs.
regards, tom lane
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-10-04 21:33:42
Subject : Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher
Previous :From : Andrew DunstanDate : 2007-10-04 21:03:36
Subject : ecpg build now breaks mingw
pgsql-patches by date
Next :From: Euler Taveira de OliveiraDate: 2007-10-07 22:47:06
Subject : pt_BR FAQ update
Previous :From : Andrew DunstanDate : 2007-10-04 20:27:06
Subject : Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL