Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Insert only tables and vacuum performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Insert only tables and vacuum performance
Date: 2004-04-30 04:30:26
Message-ID: 20619.1083299426@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> writes:
> I have a table that is never updated, only INSERTED into. Is there a way 
> I can prevent vacuum wasting time on this table

What makes you think vacuum is wasting much time on this table?  AFAICS
it will only update any unfixed hint bits ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Dennis BjorklundDate: 2004-04-30 05:26:59
Subject: Re: planner/optimizer question
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-04-30 03:57:49
Subject: Re: why can't 2 indexes be used at once?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group