Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Another history question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Juan Pablo Espino <jp(dot)espino(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Another history question
Date: 2005-03-22 22:36:28
Message-ID: 20204.1111530988@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Juan Pablo Espino <jp(dot)espino(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> My question is if the architecture of postgreSQL were inherited of
> postgres original project or postgreSQL were developed completely with
> a new concept.  Thanks in advance.

There hasn't been any fundamental rearchitecting since Berkeley days.
For instance, look at Postgres 4.2 --- those sources are available on
the net, and if you compare them to current CVS you'll find plenty
that's recognizably the same code.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-03-22 23:11:10
Subject: Re: odd problem !
Previous:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2005-03-22 22:33:04
Subject: Re: odd problem !

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group