Re: Another history question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Juan Pablo Espino <jp(dot)espino(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Another history question
Date: 2005-03-22 22:36:28
Message-ID: 20204.1111530988@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Juan Pablo Espino <jp(dot)espino(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> My question is if the architecture of postgreSQL were inherited of
> postgres original project or postgreSQL were developed completely with
> a new concept. Thanks in advance.

There hasn't been any fundamental rearchitecting since Berkeley days.
For instance, look at Postgres 4.2 --- those sources are available on
the net, and if you compare them to current CVS you'll find plenty
that's recognizably the same code.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-22 23:11:10 Re: odd problem !
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2005-03-22 22:33:04 Re: odd problem !