Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_ctl idempotent option

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
Date: 2013-01-15 19:29:45
Message-ID: 20130115192945.GF27934@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:55:41AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 1/14/13 10:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Idempotent is a ten-dollar word.  Can we find something that average
> > people wouldn't need to consult a dictionary to understand?
> 
> My suggestion in the original thread was --oknodo, but people didn't
> like that either.

That's Japanese for idempotent.  ;-)  LOL

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Boszormenyi ZoltanDate: 2013-01-15 19:36:39
Subject: Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2013-01-15 19:28:56
Subject: Re: pg_ctl idempotent option

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group