From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, radovan(dot)jablonovsky(at)replicon(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: what is maximum allowed value of autovacuum_freeze_max_age |
Date: | 2012-09-14 00:56:35 |
Message-ID: | 20120914005635.GA28254@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:13:38PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Radovan Jablonovsky wrote:
>
> > In documentation
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/routine-vacuuming.html
> > is this information about autovacuum_freeze_max_age: "if
> > autovacuum_freeze_max_age is set to its maximum allowed value of a
> > little less than two billion". What is exact maximum allowed value
> > of autovacuum_freeze_max_age?
>
> test=# select name, setting, min_val, max_val
> test-# from pg_settings where name = 'autovacuum_freeze_max_age';
> name | setting | min_val | max_val
> ---------------------------+-----------+-----------+------------
> autovacuum_freeze_max_age | 200000000 | 100000000 | 2000000000
> (1 row)
>
> Perhaps we should drop "a little less than" from the docs.
Agreed. My guess it they were really talking about the 2-billion that
is a power of 2, but I think just saying 2 billlion is better.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-09-14 00:59:26 | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade 9.2 on Windows |
Previous Message | Christian Ullrich | 2012-09-13 21:36:56 | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade 9.2 on Windows |