From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | shortcutter(at)googlemail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas |
Date: | 2012-05-31 14:07:57 |
Message-ID: | 20120531.230757.2014494683420217075.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> Just for record, I rerun the test again with my single-LOCK patch, and
>> now total runtime of pg_dump is 113 minutes.
>> 188 minutes(9.0)->125 minutes(git master)->113 minutes(with my patch).
>>
>> So far, I'm glad to see 40% time savings at this point.
>
> I see only 9.6% savings (100 * (113/125 - 1)). What am I missing?
What I meant was (100 * (113/188 - 1)).
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-05-31 14:16:41 | Re: FailedAssertion("!(PrivateRefCount[i] == 0)", File: "bufmgr.c", Line: 1741 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-31 14:00:28 | Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Klemme | 2012-05-31 14:17:11 | Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas |
Previous Message | Robert Klemme | 2012-05-31 13:38:35 | Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas |