From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and statistics |
Date: | 2012-03-13 21:42:41 |
Message-ID: | 20120313214241.GB23790@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:29:22PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I went even lower than you suggested:
>
> set default_statistics_target = 4;
>
> And it was much faster, but still more time than the pg_upgrade run
> itself:
>
> cir=# analyze;
> ANALYZE
> Time: 474319.826 ms
>
> A little under 8 minutes.
What is the target=10 duration? I think 10 is as low as we can
acceptably recommend. Should we recommend they run vacuumdb twice, once
with default_statistics_target = 4, and another with the default?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-13 22:20:46 | Re: wal_buffers, redux |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-03-13 21:40:09 | Re: pg_upgrade and statistics |