Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem
Date: 2011-09-05 15:48:50
Message-ID: 20110905154850.GA30525@depesz.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 08:05:51AM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:54:20PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Working with depesz, I have found the cause.  The code I added to fix
> > pg_upgrade in 9.0.4 and earlier releases didn't handle old 8.3 servers
> > properly.  I mistakenly processed toast table with the same pg_dump
> > query as used for pre-8.4 toast tables, not realizing those were not
> > functional because there were no reloptions for toast tables in pre-8.4.
> 
> Thanks a lot. Will test and post results (around sunday/monday I guess).

All worked.
pg_upgrade/vacuum didn't raise any errors. Will check some random
queries too, but don't expect anything to break.

thanks again for quick help.

Best regards,

depesz


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-09-05 15:51:35
Subject: Use of literal in SGML docs
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2011-09-05 15:21:46
Subject: Re: regress test failed

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-09-05 15:56:34
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem
Previous:From: Radosław SmoguraDate: 2011-09-05 15:01:31
Subject: Re: Protocol question - fastpath & parameter status 'S'

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group