Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I think this should be left alone.  As you said, it isn't worth it.
> 
> Agreed it is not worth it but I think we should at least C comment
> something.   I think at a minimum we should set it to
> FirstNormalTransactionId.
> 
> I am not so concerned about this case but about other cases where we are
> computing xid distances across the invalid range.

Please ignore the patch I had attached.  I realize it just moves the
problem around.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

• Re: Bug in autovacuum.c? at 2011-04-01 21:48:16 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Jim Nasby	Date: 2011-04-01 21:59:40
	Subject: Re: Bug in autovacuum.c?
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2011-04-01 21:48:16
	Subject: Re: Bug in autovacuum.c?