Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I have reviewed is_absolute_path() and have implemented
> > path_is_relative_and_below_cwd() to cleanly handle cases like 'E:abc' on
> > Win32; patch attached.
> This patch appears to remove some security-critical restrictions.
> Why did you delete the path_contains_parent_reference calls?
They are now in path_is_relative_and_below_cwd(), and I assume we can
allow ".." for an absolute path in these cases, i.e. it has to match the
data or log path we defined, and I don't see a general reason to prevent
".." in absolute paths, only relative ones.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2011-02-03 18:20:48|
|Subject: Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]|
|Previous:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2011-02-03 18:17:08|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...|