On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 05:06:34PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > The whole thing just seems too fragile and dangerous to be worth dealing
> > with given that actual usage will be a corner case. *I* sure wouldn't
> > trust it to work when the chips were down.
> I hope this assessment proves to be incorrect, because like Magnus and Heikki, I think this will be a major usability improvement. It takes us from "there's a way to do that" to "it just works".
(It just works)++ :)
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alexey Klyukin||Date: 2011-01-11 22:25:35|
|Subject: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2011-01-11 22:10:59|
|Subject: Re: Something fishy about the current Makefiles|