* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> It's already a basic requirement that they need to be the same -
> replicating over a CREATE TABLESPACE is going to fail otherwise..
> Being able to deal with that in a nice way would be good, of course,
> but we don't have that today.
If CREATE TABLESPACE replication also looked at the flag I was
proposing, it could work. :) Of course, the admin wouldn't be able
to move the directory/change the symlink to where they actually want
it to be w/o taking the replication server down, but I'm not sure
that's a show-stopper...
It's certainly not the cleanest/nicest approach, don't get me wrong, but
I really hate the idea of forcing people to have an identical filesystem
layout on the slave that they have on the master.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2011-01-03 16:35:18|
|Subject: Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2011-01-03 16:29:19|
|Subject: Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question
about duplicated ctid|