Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle

From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Date: 2010-10-25 19:51:41
Message-ID: 201010251251.41812.ahodgson@simkin.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On October 25, 2010 11:36:24 am Divakar Singh wrote:
> Above results show good INSERT performance of PG when using SQL procedures.
> But performance when I use C++ lib is very bad. I did that test some time
> back so I do not have data for that right now.

Wrap it in a transaction.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-10-25 19:52:59 Re: add label to enum syntax
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-10-25 19:46:19 Re: add label to enum syntax

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2010-10-25 20:28:57 Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2010-10-25 19:26:41 Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle