Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.

From: Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, david(at)fetter(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.
Date: 2010-10-14 18:40:57
Message-ID: 201010142040.57444.rsmogura@softperience.eu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

> Regarding JDBC in the CF process -- other interfaces are handled
> there. I haven't seen one patch this size for JDBC since I've been
> involved, let alone two competing patches to implement the same
> feature. Small patches which can be quickly handled don't make sense
> to put into the process, but it seemed reasonable for these.

In any way I'm sending this patch, and I will put this under Miscellaneous in
CF. This cleared patch takes only 47k (in uncleared was some binary read
classes) and about 50% it's big test case.

Have a nice day,
Radek

Attachment Content-Type Size
statemnt_to_20101014.patch.gz application/x-gzip 8.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-14 18:50:26 Re: [HACKERS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-10-14 18:34:54 Re: BUG #5650: Postgres service showing as stopped when in fact it is running

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-10-14 21:57:37 Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-10-14 17:25:13 Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.