On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:14:42AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 09:09 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 29.09.2010 10:56, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >> This feature is important, and we need to get it done. How do
> > >> we get the ball rolling again?
> > Agreed. Actually, given the lack of people jumping in and telling
> > us what they'd like to do with the feature, maybe it's not that
> > important after all.
> I don't see anything has stalled.
I do. We're half way through this commitfest, so if no one's actually
ready to commit one of the patches, I kinda have to bounce them both,
at least to the next CF.
The very likely outcome of that, given that it's a pretty enormous
feature that involves even more enormous amounts of testing on various
hardware, networks, etc., is that we don't get SR in 9.1, and you
among others will be very unhappy.
So yes, it is stalled, and yes, there's a real urgency to actually
getting a baseline something in there in the next couple of weeks.
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-09-30 13:45:00|
|Subject: Re: Using streaming replication as log archiving|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-09-30 12:46:02|
|Subject: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array|