Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-01-29 23:15:08
Message-ID: 201001300015.35134.andres@anarazel.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Friday 29 January 2010 23:54:15 Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in
> > 9.1?
> 
> That seems quite useless.
> 
> I note that we've made such statements before and not followed through
> on them; one that just came up again is that contrib/xml2 is a couple
> releases past when it was said it'd be removed, and there is still no
> prospect of it really dying in the near future.
> The bottom line is that these sorts of changes take actual *work*,
> and not a trivial amount of it.  No amount of blather in the
> documentation will substitute for somebody doing the work.
It is not about somebody doing the work, it is about lowering the impact a 
bit.

Andres

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-01-29 23:56:03
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2010-01-29 23:02:23
Subject: Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group