Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > I think this is a bad style to use for commit messages. For GIT, a good
> > > commit message is a first line being a summary, and a more extensive
> > > message below.
> > That is just too odd. I think I forgot about the summary idea then.
> What is odd?
> If I was unclear, look at this status page:
> Note that for your commit it only says "PG_MAJORVERSION:". You have to
> open the patch's page to see the rest of the message.
Well, having the description and then a blank line in the middle just is
too odd for too small a group of viewers. I might as well just type the
commit message as normal and users can see all they can.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-01-07 03:49:18|
|Subject: Re: pgsql: PG_MAJORVERSION: For simplicity, use PG_MAJORVERSION rather than|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-01-07 03:37:10|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Support ALTER TABLESPACE name SET/RESET ( tablespace_options ).|