Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: Verifying variable names in pgbench
Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote: > We can remove the complexity if we give up showing the command (arg0) > in error messages. Shall we remove it? Simplified patch attached. Here is the proposal for the arg0 issue. I added "context" argument to putVariable(). The context is a command name for \setXXX commands, 'option' for -D option, or 'startup' for internal assignment in startup. Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment: pgbench_verify_varname_20100105.patch
Description: application/octet-stream (4.7 KB)
Description: application/octet-stream (4.7 KB)
In response to
- Re: Verifying variable names in pgbench at 2010-01-04 01:34:42 from Takahiro Itagaki
Responses
- Re: Verifying variable names in pgbench at 2010-01-05 03:33:47 from Robert Haas
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: John Naylor Date: 2010-01-05 03:14:40 Subject: Re: Does parallel make require guards against duplicate actions? Previous: From: Tom Lane Date: 2010-01-05 02:58:58 Subject: Does parallel make require guards against duplicate actions?