From: | Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mike Ellsworth <younicycle(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL List - Novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Anonymous code blocks |
Date: | 2009-11-25 22:34:12 |
Message-ID: | 20091125223412.GF3803@eddie |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:01:59AM -0500, Mike Ellsworth wrote:
> If I wanted to use this new feature in user expressions so that:
>
> DO.this= round("ben_stmt"."base_pay") +
> round("ben_stmt"."incent_comp") + round("ben_stmt"."advance_ben_dol")
> + round("ben_stmt"."er_cont_other")
> DO.that = round(DO.this/12)
> DO.yada = if(DO.that < 1000, 'consider a vegetable garden.','')
I'm not sure I understand your question, but one thing springs to mind, namely
that as currently implemented these anonymous blocks can't return any data.
- Josh / eggyknap
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Kewley | 2009-11-26 00:47:06 | Re: Column aliases for GROUP BY and HAVING |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-25 19:35:09 | Re: Column aliases for GROUP BY and HAVING |