Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Planner question - "bit" data types

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Date: 2009-09-06 00:15:00
Message-ID: 20090906001500.GA5101@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Karl Denninger escribió:
> Tom Lane wrote:

> > You never showed us any EXPLAIN results,
> Yes I did.  Go back and look at the archives.  I provided full EXPLAIN
> and EXPLAIN ANALYZE results for the original query.  Sheesh.

You did?  Where?  This is your first message in this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-09/msg00059.php
No EXPLAINs anywhere to be seen.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Karl DenningerDate: 2009-09-06 00:19:04
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Previous:From: Karl DenningerDate: 2009-09-05 23:39:14
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group