Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications
Date: 2009-07-28 08:32:06
Message-ID: 200907281132.06878.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sunday 26 July 2009 14:35:41 Sam Mason wrote:
> I'm coming to the conclusion that you really need to link to external
> material here; there must be good (and canonical) definitions of these
> things outside and because SE-PG isn't self contained I really think you
> need to link to them.

This is not supposed to be user documentation. It's supposed to be a feature
specification that an implementation can be validated against.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Williamson 2009-07-28 09:20:29 Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-07-28 07:57:32 Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications