On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 08:22:52AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > Joshua, in the tests that you've been running, did you have to rig the
> > planner with "enable_mergjoin=off" or similar, to get the queries to use
> > hash joins?
> I didn't have to fiddle anything, but Josh's tests were more exhaustive.
The planner chose hash joins for the queries I was running, regardless
of whether the patch was applied. I didn't have to mess with any
settings to get hash joins.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2009-02-26 15:23:35|
|Subject: Re: Have \d show child tables that inherit from thespecified parent|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-02-26 14:54:18|
|Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)|