Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pet Peeves?

From: "Karsten Hilbert" <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-02-04 08:39:49
Message-ID: 20090204083949.76770@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
> > Craig, what kind of "events" are you thinking about?  Triggers are 
> > already pieces of code that run upon "certain events", namely insert, 
> > update or delete events.  What others do you have in mind?
> 
> That's a good point, actually. I can't think of much you can't do with a 
> trigger (SECURITY DEFINER if necessary) on a table. Not thinking straight.

I would find ON CONNECT/DISCONNECT triggers very useful. Probably
this is more similar to database-wide assertions.

Karsten
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01

In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Richard HuxtonDate: 2009-02-04 08:49:28
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2009-02-04 08:20:44
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group