On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:46:22 +0000
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> rhubbell <Rhubbell(at)iHubbell(dot)com> writes:
> > What's your list look like? Or maybe you want everyone else to do your work
> > for you and don't have anything to share.
> Heh, fair enough. Perhaps I should just say you should come to FOSDEM though
Haha, yeah buy the book, come to the show, see the movie.
Well I don't know what is FOSDEM. Will the talks be placed online
at some point? Up to each contributor? I'll check out what's FOSDEM.
> The usual bugaboos are things like having to do a dump/restore to upgrade,
> weak support for partitioning, no index-only-scans, etc. Things which have
> been mentioned several times.
> One thing which has *not* been mentioned which i find positively shocking is
> VACUUM. This was once our single biggest source of user complaints. Between
> Autovacuum improvements and HOT previously and the free space map in 8.4 the
> situation will be much improved. However there are still some common usage
> patterns where people run into problems.
I think it was mentioned.
Anyway glad to see that there's vibrant discussion here. Usually a sign of
a healthy community.
> Gregory Stark
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
> Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Sam Mason||Date: 2009-01-30 21:25:35|
|Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?|
|Previous:||From: Tony Caduto||Date: 2009-01-30 20:49:56|
|Subject: Re: PGSQL or other DB?|