Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

pgsql: When we added the ability to have zero-element ARRAY[] constructs

From: tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org (Tom Lane)
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: When we added the ability to have zero-element ARRAY[] constructs
Date: 2008-12-19 05:04:35
Message-ID: 20081219050435.59A1B7563FE@cvs.postgresql.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Log Message:
-----------
When we added the ability to have zero-element ARRAY[] constructs by adding an
explicit cast to show the intended array type, we forgot to teach ruleutils.c
to print out such constructs properly.  Found by noting bogus output from
recent changes in polymorphism regression test.

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt:
        ruleutils.c (r1.289 -> r1.290)
        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c?r1=1.289&r2=1.290)
    pgsql/src/test/regress/expected:
        polymorphism.out (r1.17 -> r1.18)
        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/polymorphism.out?r1=1.17&r2=1.18)

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: User MkzDate: 2008-12-19 12:18:29
Subject: pgbouncer - pgbouncer: win32: no need for -subservice switch, instead
Previous:From: User ItagakiDate: 2008-12-19 03:46:07
Subject: orafce - orafce: Add utl_file_fcopy().

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group