Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So, to a first approximation, the PG list traffic has been constant
> >> since 2000. Not the result I expected.
> > I also was confused by its flatness. I am finding the email traffic
> > almost impossible to continue tracking, so something different is
> > happening, but it seems it is not volume-related.
> Yes, my perception also is that it's getting harder and harder to keep
> up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple
> volume count doesn't capture.
Agreed. I am struggling to put into words some of my angst, but I am
concerned I will not be able to offer the same guarantees I have done in
previous releases that every bug has been either fixed or added to the
TODO list, and every submitted patch has been either applied or rejected.
There, I said it. :-(
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2008-11-21 04:43:58|
|Subject: Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-11-21 03:59:31|
|Subject: Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time |