Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time
Date: 2008-11-21 04:06:58
Message-ID: 200811210406.mAL46wC14277@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So, to a first approximation, the PG list traffic has been constant
> >> since 2000.  Not the result I expected.
> 
> > I also was confused by its flatness.  I am finding the email traffic
> > almost impossible to continue tracking, so something different is
> > happening, but it seems it is not volume-related.
> 
> Yes, my perception also is that it's getting harder and harder to keep
> up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple
> volume count doesn't capture.

Agreed.  I am struggling to put into words some of my angst, but I am
concerned I will not be able to offer the same guarantees I have done in
previous releases that every bug has been either fixed or added to the
TODO list, and every submitted patch has been either applied or rejected.

There, I said it.  :-(

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-11-21 04:43:58
Subject: Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-11-21 03:59:31
Subject: Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group